MP's Basmati GI Tag Demand - Validity and Concerns

iasparliament Logo
July 18, 2020

What is the issue?

  • The Madhya Pradesh (MP) government is seeking Geographical Indication (GI) tag for Basmati rice produced in 13 of its districts.
  • But the All India Rice Exporters’ Association (AIREA) argues against this. Here is why.

What is Geographical Indication (GI) tag?

  • GI might apply to an agricultural, natural or a manufactured product.
  • A GI product must originate from a specific geographical area due to which it possesses unique characteristics and qualities.
  • GI tag is essentially an assurance that the product is coming from that specific area.
  • It is a kind of trademark in the international market.

What is the present GI status of Basmati?

  • In May 2010, APEDA got GI certification for Basmati.
  • [APEDA - Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority; a statutory body under the Commerce Ministry]
  • The above GI applied for the region located in Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) below the foothills of the Himalayas, spreads across 7 states.
  • These are Himachal Pradesh, J&K, Punjab, Haryana, Uttarakhand, Western UP (26 districts) and Delhi.
  • According to APEDA, Basmati rice is identified as a ‘long grain, aromatic rice.’
  • The origin and reputation for this from the IGP is found in tradition, folklore, scientific and culinary literature and political and historical records.
  • Dehraduni Basmati, Amritsar Basmati and Tarawari basmati are being produced for hundreds of years.
  • [For cultivation of basmati paddy, alluvial soil having high water retention capacity is more suitable.]

What are MP's claims and demands?

  • Madhya Pradesh (MP) falls in the Madhya Bharat Pathar (plateau).
  • It does not fall in the IGP (Indo-Gangetic Plains) region.
  • MP started cultivation of varieties of Basmati rice only around the middle of the first decade of this century (21st C).
  • But it claims that this rice possesses the same characteristics and qualities as that of the rice grown in the IGP.
  • It also claims that nearly 80,000 farmers of the state are growing Basmati in 13 districts.
  • They are exporting the same worth Rs 3,000 crore annually.
  • With these, MP government seeks GI tag for its Basmati rice.

What are MP government's efforts at this end?

  • Apart from putting pressure on the Centre, MP has appealed in Madras High Court.
  • But its plea was rejected in February 2020.
  • Earlier too in 2016, Intellectual Properties Appellate Board (IPBA) in Chennai had given the decision in favour of the APEDA.
  • [APEDA is not in favour of including MP in the GI list.]
  • Despite these orders, MP has been repeatedly agitating and trying its best through political and bureaucratic channels.
  • Even many traders from MP are selling the rice from MP using the IGP imagery on their packages.
  • This is despite the fact that MP is located far away down south of the IGP.

Why can MP not be rightfully offered the GI tag?

  • Under WTO’s TRIPs (trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights) agreement, physical attributes are not enough for a product to earn GI tag.
  • The reputation linked to the geographical region is also essential and imperative.
  • As per GI of Goods (Registration & Protection) Act in 2003 too, ‘reputation’ to a geographical area is central to the GI recognition.
  • In the case of Basmati rice, only the above-mentioned 7 states have that reputation.
  • Even if the rice grown in MP has all the required characteristics, it would not still entitle such rice to qualify as Basmati.
  • This is much like the fact that sparkling wine produced in Australia or California or Italy cannot be called Champagne (-France).
  • Likewise, Kancheepuram Silk Sari is a GI product, but a Banarasi sari cannot claim a share of the status though it might be as beautiful as the Kancheepuram Sari.
  • The same goes with Basmati; any rice which is grown outside the designated area cannot be called Basmati.

Why is AIREA particularly opposed to MP's demand?

  • India stands tall in the global arena as the only producer of premium Basmati.
  • No other country (other than 18 districts of Pakistan) can call any of its rice as ‘Basmati’.
  • It had been a tough battle for the country to protect Basmati name from the encroachment of various nations.
  • Notably, many countries came out with their own versions of Basmati.
  • It is only the GI tag that has protected India's Basmati.
  • This is because it has been grown from time immemorial in the IGP area of India and 18 districts of Pakistan’s Punjab.
  • This indisputable fact alone has enabled India to win the various cases.
  • Notably, APEDA has taken up over a 1,000 legal actions in nearly 50 countries, spread across all the continents.
  • It has spent over Rs 200/300 crores in promoting Basmati rice, defending its GI status and shaping it into a global brand.
  • Given this, if MP is included in the GI list of Basmati crop, it would harm the reputation of Indian Basmati as a whole.
  • It would also affect the national interest.

What are the possible implications if MP is offered its demand?

  • Any such inclusion will nullify APEDA’s efforts made earlier to secure and protect Indian Basmati since 1995.
  • All those 50 and more nations had been unequivocally restricted from calling any of their aromatic rice’s with even “Basmati-like” names.
  • If MP is included, all of them will grab the opportunity to start sowing Basmati.
  • Pakistan and China will also be equally benefitted.
  • If Basmati loses its premium tag it will deprive over 20 lakh farmers of the 7 states from the economic premium of growing this unique product.
  • The decision thus involves preserving and protecting the integrity of one of the most cherished national produce of India.


Source: The Indian Express

Login or Register to Post Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to review.



Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme