Impediments to inter-state migrations dampen growth and perpetuate pockets of poverty. Do you agree? Give reasons in support of your answer. (200 words)
Refer – The Indian Express
Enrich the answer from other sources, if the question demands.
IAS Parliament 7 years
KEY POINTS
· Barriers to internal mobility include physical distance and linguistic differences.
· Differences in economic and social features among different states are also among notable reasons.
· Despite these, there are a range of other factors that works as disincentives to inter-state migration.
· Social Benefits - A majority of social entitlement programmes are administered by state governments, even when they are centrally funded.
· In essence, many of the social benefits and entitlements are not portable across state boundaries.
· Access to subsidised food through the public distribution system (PDS) is a major reason.
· Evidently, in states where the PDS offers higher levels of coverage, unskilled migrants are less likely to move out-of-state.
· Even admissions to public hospitals, schools, etc are administered through ration cards issued and accepted only by the home state government.
· This eliminates access to productive opportunities available across the country thus, dampening growth and perpetuate pockets of poverty.
· Education - Many universities and technical institutes are administered by state governments.
· Notably, state residents get preferential admission in these through “state quota seats”.
· The “domicile certificates” necessary for this require continuous residence in the state, ranging from 3 to 10 years in different states.
· Employment - Though accounting for only about 5% of total employment, public sector employs more than half of the higher-skilled.
· However, in most states, more than three-fourths of government jobs are with the state rather than the central government.
· Here again, state domicile is a common requirement for jobs in state government entities.
· Moreover, states are increasingly expanding and promoting the “jobs for natives” policies in the recent period.
· E.g. Karnataka recently directed both public and private sector firms to reserve 70% of their jobs for state residents or would lose access to state government industrial policy benefits.
Solutions
· India's “fragmented entitlements” should be integrated to offer citizens access to social benefits irrespective of the residing state.
· This is essential to boost growth and check poverty, by facilitating access to productive opportunities available across the country.
· A nationally portable identity could prove to be an important step.
· States should rationalise the discriminatory policies and become more inclusive in offering employment and education.
