0.2117
7667766266
x

Judicial Recusal

iasparliament Logo
May 25, 2023

Why in news?

The Supreme Court judge Justice MR Shah refused to recuse himself from hearing a plea by former Indian Police Service (IPS) officer Sanjiv Bhatt.

What is Judicial Recusal?

  • Judicial recusal is when a judge withdraws from a case due to a conflict of interest or a reasonable apprehension of bias.
  • This is done to ensure that the case is decided fairly and that the outcome is not influenced by the personal biases of the judge.
  • The practice of judicial recusal stems from the cardinal principle of due process of law, which requires that all parties to a case be treated fairly and impartially.
  • If a judge recuses themselves, the case is assigned to a different judge.
  • Judicial recusal is an important part of ensuring that the justice system is fair and impartial.

Types of judicial recusal

Automatic recusal

Discretionary recusal

This occurs when a judge is required to recuse themselves by law.

This occurs when a judge has the discretion to recuse themselves.

Example - A judge must recuse themselves if they have a financial interest in the outcome of the case.

Example - A judge may recuse themselves if they have a close personal relationship with one of the parties.

In legal terms, bench fixing, bench hunting or forum shopping refers to petitioners managing to get their cases heard by a particular judge or court to ensure a favorable order.

Why do judges recuse themselves?

  • Financial or personal interest in the outcome of the case
  • Prior involvement in the case, such as having served as a lawyer or judge in the case
  • A close personal relationship with one of the parties
  • A belief that they cannot be impartial in the case

What are the rules governing judicial recusal in India?

  • No codified rules governing recusals - In India but several Supreme Court judgments have dealt with the issue.
  • Supreme Court - Has over time outlined various factors to be taken into consideration for deciding the impartiality of a judge.
  • Ranjit Thakur v. Union of India (1987) - SC held that it is important for the judge to be honest in the eyes of the concerned party rather than himself.
  • State of West Bengal v. Shivananda Pathak (1998) - Defined that it is a condition of mind which renders the judge incapable of impartiality in a particular case, the Court explained.
  • Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India (2015) - Court observed that where a judge has a pecuniary interest, no further inquiry is needed as to whether there was a ‘real danger’ or ‘reasonable suspicion’ of bias.
  • Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal and Ors (2019) - Court held that held that a judge who had rendered any decision in a smaller combination is not disqualified from being part of a larger Bench to which a reference is made.

What is the judicial recuse practice in foreign nations?

  • United States - The Code of Conduct for United States Judges sets out the rules governing judicial recusal.
  • The Code of Conduct provides that a judge must recuse themselves if they have a financial interest in the outcome of the case, or if they have a close personal relationship with one of the parties.
  • The Code of Conduct also provides that a judge must recuse themselves if there is a reasonable apprehension of bias.
  • United Kingdom - The Judicial Conduct and Investigations Office (JCIO) is responsible for investigating allegations of judicial misconduct.
  • JCIO has published guidance on judicial recusal, which sets out the principles that judges should follow when considering whether or not to recuse themselves.
  • Canada - Canadian Judicial Council (CJC) is responsible for overseeing the conduct of judges.
  • CJC has published a code of conduct for judges, which sets out the rules governing judicial recusal.

What is the way forward?

  • Need for clarity and transparency in recusal procedures
  • Need of Balancing the impartiality with the discretion of judges
  • Need of maintaining public confidence in the justice system through fair and transparent recusal practices

Reference

  1. The Hindu│ Judicial Recuse
Login or Register to Post Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to review.

ARCHIVES

MONTH/YEARWISE ARCHIVES

sidetext
Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme
sidetext