- Fiscal Autonomy-Kerala claims the Centre’s amendments to the FRBM Act, 2003, infringe upon its fiscal autonomy.
- Borrowing limit- The Centre’s amendments have reduced Kerala’s borrowing limit significantly, impacting the state’s financial crisis management.
- Constitutional violation- Kerala argues that the Centre’s actions encroach upon the state’s legislative domain, violating the 7th Schedule of the Constitution.
- Financial crisis-The state fears that without intervention, the imposed financial constraints could have long-lasting detrimental effects.
- One time package- It was suggested by Supreme Court for Kerala to help with funds shortage while imposing stricter conditions for the next financial year.
- The State rejected Rs 5000 crore loan as it would need around 10,000 crore rupees as loan.
|
- State’s financial crisis-The Centre argues that Kerala's financial woes are due to the state's mismanagement and extravagance, not the borrowing limit.
- FRBM Act-Fiscal transactions between states and the Centre are governed by the FRBM Act, 2003, with borrowing limits set as 3% of the Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP).
- 15th Finance Commission- It labeled Kerala as "highly debt stressed," with a history of breaching fiscal deficit targets and high expenditure on salaries.
- The Centre has refused to relax borrowing limits citing 15th Finance Commission recommendations.
- Conditions-The Centre said its one time package offer (Rs 5000 crore) comes with strict conditions to prevent it from setting a precedent for other states to approach courts for similar packages.
- The borrowing in the first 9 months of FY25 would be issued quarterly, up to 25% of the eligible amount, after deducting the early special concession of Rs 5,000 crore.
|