- Navigation- The route is easier for transportation which are unable to transit the Suez Canal due to restrictions on the ship size.
- Efficient- It would provide alternative to sailing around Africa’s southern tip which is more time consuming and expends more fuel.
- Crisis recovery- The canal will drastically reduce the possibility of a crisis in world trade during instances like Suez Canal blockage.
- Regional development- The canal would be a strategically valuable alternative to the Suez Canal and would contribute greatly to the economic development of the region.
|
- High cost- The estimated cost of project is as high as 100 billion dollars.
- Security issues- The plan to use nuclear explosives to dig the canal through the Negev Desert makes this extremely risky.
- Military threat- The canal which will potentially transport billions of dollars’ worth of freight daily cannot run in land under constant military threat, from Hamas rockets or Israeli attacks.
- Logistical constraints- The Canal would have to overcome the challenges of the terrain and topography, such as the Dead Sea basin, which is below sea level, and the Negev Mountain Range, which would require a lot of excavation.
|