0.2960
7667766266
x

Marriage registration in Gujarat

iasparliament Logo
February 23, 2026

Prelims: Current events of national and international importance | Government policies and interventions

Why in News?

The Gujarat government’s move to mandate consent of parents for registration of a marriage flies in the face of constitutional rights of individuals that are routinely safeguarded by several court rulings.

  • Registration Acts - Marriage registration is usually done under the Gujarat Marriage Registration Act, 2006 (or under the Special Marriage Act, 1954 for civil/inter-faith marriages).
  • Proposed Amendments to Marriage Registration Rules (2026).
  • Article 21 - It guarantees the protection of life and personal liberty; this right has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to include the freedom to choose a partner without external interference.
  • High Courts also routinely protect couples seeking police protection from their families.
  • Key Proposed Changes - Mandatory declaration about parents -
    • Couples must state whether they have their parents about the marriage.
    • Details such as parents’ Aadhaar, address and contact numbers must be submitted.
  • Parental notification - The Assistant Registrar will officially notify parents (electronically or physically) within 10 working days after application acceptance.
  • 30-day waiting period - Marriage registration will only be completed 30 days after application, allowing time for verification.
  • Online portal - All details are to be uploaded on a government portal for transparency and record keeping.
  • Purpose of the Amendments - The government says the changes aim to
    • Prevent fraudulent marriages and exploitation
    • Curb misuse of deceptive marriage certificates
    • Enhance transparency in registration
  • Related cases - Laxmibai Chandaragi B versus State of Karnataka – In 2021, the Supreme Court reiterated that the consent of the family or the community or the clan is not necessary for adults to marry.
  • Shafi Jahan v KM Ashokan - In 2018, the Supreme Court, in a case of interfaith marriage that was challenged by the woman’s parents, had upheld an individual’s right to marry a person of one’s own choice as well as the right to choose a religion.
  • Lata Singh v State of Uttar Pradesh - In 2006 ruling, the Supreme Court recognised the family as a site of violence and protected inter-caste marriages.
  • Delhi High Court in 2009 and the Allahabad High Court in 2021 had even struck down the mandatory 30-day notice of a couple’s intention to marry under the Special Marriage Act, citing an invasion of privacy, even from family.

Reference

The Indian Express | Marriage registration in Gujarat

Login or Register to Post Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to review.

ARCHIVES

MONTH/YEARWISE ARCHIVES

sidetext
Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme
sidetext