What is the issue?
- There is a decline in overall investment rate between 2011-12 and 2016-17 in India.
- The household, and not corporate, sector is said to be responsible for the decline.
How important is investment?
- Growth can occur with better utilisation of existing capacity or with new investment.
- However, over the medium to long term, the key driver of growth is investment.
- Without a high investment rate, it is difficult to sustain a high growth rate.
How has income growth been?
- Over the last 4 years, the growth rate has been maintained at a reasonable level.
- The average growth rate of GDP has been 7.3%.
- However, the declining trend is a cause of concern.
- The growth rate of GDP in 2015-16 was 8.2%.
- It came down to 7.1% in the following year and 6.7% for the just ended year.
How has savings been?
- The major source of funding investment is domestic savings.
- The gross domestic savings rate has fallen in the last six years.
- It has declined from around 34% of GDP in 2011-12 to around 30% in 2016-17.
- The steepest decline in savings has been with respect to the household sector.
- Within this, both financial savings and that in physical assets have declined sharply.
- The private corporate sector savings have actually increased by almost 2.5 percentage points.
- The savings rate of the public sector including general government shows no change.
How has the investment trend been?
- Trend - The investment rate also registers a disturbing decline.
- In 2011-12, the gross fixed capital formation rate was around 34% of GDP.
- By 2016-17, it had come down to around 28%.
- Understanding the behaviour of different components of fixed capital formation is crucial to address the declining trend.
- Components - Investment (gross capital formation) includes three elements:
- gross fixed capital formation
- change in stocks
- valuables (e.g. gold)
- The most important component is gross fixed capital formation.
- It refers to the capital expenditures on machinery and equipment and dwellings.
- The gross fixed capital formation rate fell over the period from 2011-12 to 2016-17.
- However, Gross fixed capital formation stayed at a little above 7% of GDP.
- Public sector including general government showed no change.
- Private corporate sector investment showed in fact a rise.
- Hence, the only sector that appears to have been responsible for the decline in investment is households.
- Household sector’s fixed capital formation rate has shown a steep decline.
- It has declined from around 15% to nearly 9% over the six-year period.
Why is the trend a cause for concern?
- Base Year - The base year for these indicators had been revised from 2004-05 to 2011-12.
- Notably, the investment ratios according to the new series with base show a much higher rate as compared to the old series.
- E.g. the gross fixed capital formation rate for 2011-12 was 31.8% according to the older series.
- For the same year, it is 34.3% according to the new series.
- But despite the new series, the investment rate has been declining since 2011-12.
- Cause - The focus for the slowdown in growth has been on weak investment demand by the corporate sector.
- There has been increased attention to the number of stalled projects.
- This has been interpreted as a failure of the corporate sector to make investment.
- But the decline in gross fixed capital formation rate has actually been caused by the household sector rather the corporate sector.
Why is the household sector a cause?
- Household sector’s savings in physical assets, which is the same as investment, is normally in the form of housing.
- But it is difficult to attribute the sharp decline only to the reduction in investment in housing.
- Notably, the term ‘households’ includes not only individual households but also non-corporate business.
- By definition what is not government and private corporate comes under the category of households.
- Households' investment in machinery and equipment came down in 2012-13 to 2015-16 period.
- Therefore, in part small businesses have suffered more and invested less.
- Within the business sector, the non-corporate business seems to have borne a higher burden.
- Thus, the fall in investment rate as an explanation for the slowdown in growth is reasonable.
- But clearly, the corporate investment, as believed, is not the cause.
Source: The Hindu