Why in news?
The Supreme Court, in its recent order, has struck down the Reserve Bank of India’s ‘February 12 circular’.
What was the February 12 circular?
- The RBI circular issued on February 12, 2018 is essentially a revised framework for the resolution of stressed assets.
- The circular went into effect on the same day that it was issued.
- All existing schemes for stressed asset resolution were withdrawn with immediate effect, which included the -
- Framework for Revitalising Distressed Assets
- Corporate Debt Restructuring Scheme
- Flexible Structuring of Existing Long Term Project Loans
- Strategic Debt Restructuring Scheme (SDR)
- Change in Ownership outside SDR
- Scheme for Sustainable Structuring of Stressed Assets (S4A)
- All these schemes allowed more lenient terms of resolution than the February 12 circular.
- As per the circular, banks were required to immediately start working on a resolution plan for accounts over Rs 2,000 crore.
- It prescribes insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), for a debt servicing default beyond 180 days.
- Also, banks have to recognise loans as non-performing even if the repayment was delayed by just one day.
- Not adhering to the timelines in the circular would attract stringent supervisory and enforcement actions.
- The RBI argued that the circular had been issued in the public interest, with a view to ensure the timely resolution of stressed assets.
- It was intended to stop the “evergreening” of bad loans.
What were the concerns?
- Several companies from the power and shipping sectors had challenged the circular.
- They had argued that the time given by the RBI was not enough to tackle bad debt.
- Power producers contended that the RBI’s ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach was impractical as the sector had to confront many external factors.
- These included the unavailability of coal and gas, and problems arising out of state governments' failure to honour power purchase agreements. Click here to know more.
- These factors were beyond its control, and so made an early revival difficult for them.
- The total debt impacted by the circular stands at Rs 3.8 lakh crore across 70 large borrowers.
- These include Rs 2 lakh crore across 34 borrowers in the power sector alone.
- As of March 31, 2018, 92% of this debt had been classified as non-performing, and banks have made provisions of over 25-40% on these accounts.
- The government too had asked the RBI to make sector-specific relaxations in the timeline for the implementation of the circular.
What is the Supreme Court's present order?
- The Supreme Court held the February 12 circular “ultra vires as a whole”.
- This means that the RBI had gone beyond its powers and thus the circular is “of no effect in law”.
- The order provides immediate relief to companies that have defaulted in repayments, especially those in power, shipping and sugar sectors.
What is the possible drawback?
- The circular had significantly tightened stressed loan recognition and resolution for large borrowers.
- Now, banks will have the choice of devising resolution plans or going to the National Company Law Tribunal under the IBC.
- So the urgency that the RBI’s rules had introduced in the system could be impacted.
- In effect, the verdict could delay the process of stressed assets resolution which had just taken pace.
Source: Indian Express
Author: Shankar Civil Service Coaching Center Coimbatore
Visit for Daily Current Affairs on Indian Economy