Why in news?
The recent budget proposed an increase in customs duty on a range of products, particularly in the labour-intensive sectors.
What is the rationale?
- GST - Addressing GST and the associated hurdles in the manufacturing sector is one of the reasons for the tariff move.
- Imports - More importantly, it is to discourage imports, mostly from China and other Asian countries.
- Some items in tariffs increases are certainly due to the threat of flooding of cheap Chinese goods, affecting India’s small industries.
- This includes mobile phones (15 to 20%), adapters and phone chargers (nil to 10%), silk fabrics (10 to 20%), etc.
- Job Loss - The move is also an effort to address the crisis over jobs lost due to Free Trade Agreement-related imports over time.
- The draft industrial policy 2017 finds mention in this context.
- The policy observes that a “duty structure that favours import of final products can act as disincentives for domestic manufacturers”.
What would the impact be?
- The tariff measure is expected to boost local manufacturing and incentivize domestic value addition.
- The move, in particular, will facilitate and take forward the Make in India programme.
- This, in turn, is expected to promote creation of more jobs in the country.
- The job opportunities in turn will benefit the youth and contribute towards the overall growth of the economy.
What are the possible challenges?
- India could be dragged to WTO over the recent tariff increases.
- The imposition of higher duties on electronics goods, including phones, goes against WTO’s Information Technology Agreement.
- Under this 1996 agreement, India is required to eliminate tariffs on some electronics goods and IT products, including mobile phones.
- However, India maintains that IT and telecom technologies have evolved with new applications and equipment.
- These were neither existent nor even conceived at the time of signing the ITA-I in December 1996.
- Also, India is not undertaking any fresh commitments under ITA-2 agreement that came into force more than two years ago.
What is the way forward?
- India’s recent move seems to be reflecting the protectionist climate prevailing world over.
- Investment in physical and social infrastructure would be better options than protectionism.
- The way out is to promote industry through setting up industrial zones which will reduce the logistics costs.
Source: Business Line
